Switching from FOLFIRI plus cetuximab to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab based on early tumor shrinkage in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A phase II trial (HYBRID).

BACKGROUND: Long-term anti-EGFR antibody treatment increases the risk of severe dermatologic toxicities. This single-arm, phase II trial aimed to investigate the strategy of switching from cetuximab to bevacizumab in combination with FOLFIRI based on early tumor shrinkage (ETS) in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Radiologic assessment was performed to evaluate ETS, defined as ≥20% reduction in the sum of the largest diameters of target lesions 8 weeks after the introduction of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. ETS-negative patients switched to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, whereas ETS-positive patients continued FOLFIRI plus cetuximab for eight more weeks, with a switch to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab thereafter. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. RESULTS: This trial was prematurely terminated due to poor accrual after a total enrollment of 30 patients. In 29 eligible patients, 7 were ETS-negative and 22 were ETS-positive. Two ETS-negative patients and 17 ETS-positive patients switched to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab 8 weeks and 16 weeks after initial FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, respectively. Median progression-free and overall survival durations were 13.4 and 34.7 months, respectively. Six (20%) patients experienced grade ≥3 paronychia, which improved to grade ≤2 by 18 weeks. Grade ≥3 acneiform rash, dry skin, and pruritus were not observed in any patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel treatment strategy delivered acceptable survival outcomes and reduced severe dermatologic toxicities.

[Chinese expert consensus on the management of clinical pathway and adverse events of trastuzumab deruxtecan (2024 edition)].

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is one of the new generation antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) with bystander effect. T-DXd can not only significantly improve the survival of HER-2-positive advanced breast cancer patients, but also enable advanced breast cancer patients with low HER-2 expression to benefit from HER-2-targeted therapy. T-DXd has been approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for the treatment of HER-2-positive or HER-2-low breast cancer patients. It is foreseeable that T-DXd will be widely used in clinical practice in the future. However, T-DXd has also shown different safety characteristics compared to previous HER-2 targeted drugs in clinical trials. How to manage T-DXd adverse events more reasonably and fully utilize the efficacy of T-DXd is an urgent clinical problem. Based on the existing clinical evidence and guideline consensus, combined with clinical practice experience, the expert group finally reached the consensus of clinical care pathway and adverse reaction management of trastuzumab deruxtecan after many discussions. This consensus content includes the clinical use method of T-DXd, pre-treatment patient education, and management of common or noteworthy adverse events of T-DXd. The adverse events include infusion related adverse events, digestive system adverse events (nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and decreased appetite), hematological adverse events (neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia), respiratory adverse events (interstitial lung disease/pneumonia), cardiovascular adverse events (decreased left ventricular ejection fraction), adverse events in liver function (elevated transaminases) and other common adverse events (alopecia, fatigue, etc). This consensus focuses on the prevention of adverse events, dose adjustment and treatment when adverse events occur, and recommendations for patients' lifestyle, aiming to improve clinicians' understanding of T-DXd and provide practical guidance for clinical oncologists on T-DXd clinical management.

UGT1A1 Testing in Breast Cancer: should it become routine practice in patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates?

The use of genetic testing to personalize therapeutic strategies in cancer is rapidly evolving and thus changing the landscape of treatment of oncologic patients. The UGT1A1 gene is an important component for the metabolism and glucoronidation of certain drugs, including irinotecan and sacituzumab govitecan (SG); therefore, various UGT1A1 polymorphisms leading to decreased function of the UGT1A1 enzyme may lead to increased risk of treatment-related side effects. Testing for UGT1A1 polymorphism is not routinely adopted in clinical practice; that is due to the lack of concise studies and recommendations concerning the clinical relevance of this test and its impact on the quality of life of cancer patients. The knowledge regarding UGT1A1 polymorphism and its clinical relevance will be reviewed in this article, as well as the published literature on the association between UGT1A1 polymorphism and the toxicity risk of irinotecan as well as sacituzumab govitecan. The current recommendations and guidelines on UGT1A1 testing will be discussed in detail in the hopes of providing guidance to oncologists in their clinical practice.

First-line Palliative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: a Population-based Analysis of Delivery and Outcomes in a Single-payer Health System.

AIMS: Clinical practice guidelines recommend palliative chemotherapy for most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, outcomes observed in the real world compared with patients enrolled in clinical trials have not been sufficiently described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the delivery and outcomes of first-line palliative chemotherapy administered to patients with colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice compared with clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using linked health administrative data, we carried out a retrospective population-level cohort study on patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Ontario, Canada from 2010 to 2019. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics were summarised. The primary outcome was median overall survival, stratified by treatment prescribed and age. Demographics and outcomes in this real-world population were compared with those from pivotal clinical trials. A multivariable Cox regression model reporting hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals was used to determine factors associated with survival in patients receiving systemic treatment. RESULTS: We identified 70 987 patients with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer, of which 4613 received first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease and formed the study cohort. Fifty-eight per cent were male and the mean age was 63 years. Most had colon cancer (69%), at least one comorbidity (73%) and lived in an urban location (79%). Less than half (47%) had surgery after diagnosis. The most common regimen prescribed was folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with bevacizumab or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi; n = 2784, 60%). Among all treated patients, the median overall survival was 17.1 months, with survival difference by regimen [median overall survival 18.3 for FOLFIRI with bevacizumab or EGFRi, 19.6 for folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)/capecitabine, oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab or EGFRi, 13.6 for FOLFIRI alone and 7.8 for 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine]. Patients aged >80 years were most likely to have received single-agent 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine, and had inferior overall survival compared with their younger counterparts. Compared with pivotal clinical trials, patients in the real world had inferior overall survival outcomes despite similar demographic characteristics (including age and sex). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world population-based analysis of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, survival outcomes were inferior to those reported in randomised trials despite similarities in age and sex. This information can be used when counselling patients in routine practice about expected outcomes.

Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Versus Cetuximab as Maintenance Therapy in First-Line Therapy for RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Phase III ERMES Study.

PURPOSE: The intensity of anti-EGFR-based first-line therapy for RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), once disease control is achieved, is controversial. A de-escalation strategy with anti-EGFR monotherapy represents a potential option to maintain efficacy while reducing cytotoxicity. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, phase III trial, patients with untreated RAS/BRAF wt mCRC were randomly assigned to receive either fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan/cetuximab (FOLFIRI/Cet) until disease progression (arm A) or FOLFIRI/Cet for eight cycles followed by Cet alone (arm B). The coprimary end points were a noninferior progression-free survival (PFS) in the modified per-protocol (mPP) population (>eight cycles) and a lower incidence of grade (G) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) for arm B compared with arm A. RESULTS: Overall, 606 patients were randomly assigned, with 300 assigned to arm A and 306 to arm B. The median follow-up was 22.3 months. In the mPP population, 291 events occurred with a PFS of 10 versus 12.2 months for arms B and A, respectively (P of noninferiority = .43). In the intention-to-treatment (ITT, ≥one cycle) population, 503 events occurred with a PFS of 9 versus 10.7 months (P = .39). The overall survival was 35.7 versus 30.7 months (P = .119) and 31.0 versus 25.2 months (P = .32) in the mPP and ITT population, respectively. Arm B had lower G3-4 AEs during the maintenance period than arm A (20.2% v 35.1%). CONCLUSION: The ERMES study did not demonstrate noninferiority of maintenance with Cet alone. Despite a more favorable safety profile, maintenance with single-agent Cet after induction with FOLFIRI/Cet cannot be recommended for all patients but could represent an option in selected cases.

A phase 1 study of mebendazole with bevacizumab and irinotecan in high-grade gliomas.

BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGG) have a dismal prognosis despite multimodal therapy. Mebendazole is an anti-helminthic benzimidazole that has demonstrated efficacy in numerous in vitro cancer models, and is able to cross the blood-brain barrier. We conducted a phase 1 trial (NCT01837862) to evaluate the safety of mebendazole in combination with bevacizumab and irinotecan in children and young adults with HGG. OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximally tolerated dose of mebendazole when given in combination with bevacizumab and irinotecan in children with HGG; to describe the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for this group. DESIGN/METHOD: Patients between 1 and 21 years of age with HGG were enrolled in a 3 + 3 design to escalating doses of mebendazole in combination with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg/dose) and irinotecan (150 mg/m2 /dose). Subjects were eligible upfront after completion of radiation or at the time of progression. Mebendazole was taken orally twice per day continuously, and bevacizumab and irinotecan were given intravenously on Days 1 and 15 of 28-day cycles. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, 10 subjects were enrolled at mebendazole doses of 50 mg/kg/day (n = 3), 100 mg/kg/day (n = 4), and 200 mg/kg/day (n = 3). One subject assigned to 100 mg/kg/day was not evaluable. Seven subjects had a diagnosis of diffuse midline glioma, one subject had anaplastic astrocytoma, and one subject had a spinal HGG. All subjects received radiation. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most frequent G3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (n = 3) and lymphopenia (n = 4). The overall response rate was 33%, with two subjects achieving a partial response and one subject achieving a complete response sustained for 10 months. The mean PFS and OS from the start of study treatment were 4.7 and 11.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mebendazole was safe and well tolerated when administered with bevacizumab and irinotecan at doses up to 200 mg/kg/day. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this treatment.

Sacituzumab Govitecan as a Second-Line Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy, the only treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), showed decreased survival rates. Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) could be a possible target for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). OBJECTIVE: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an anti-Trop-2 ADC for pretreating relapsed/refractory mTNBC patients, was studied to know the efficacy and safety profile of the drug in mTNBC. METHODS: The present review searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), WHO Clinical Trial Registry, Clinical Trials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until December 25, 2022. The studies searched comprised randomized trials and observational studies (retrospective [case-control, cross-sectional] and prospective [cohort designs]). Efficacy assessment was performed in terms of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), objective response rate (ORR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), and clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety in terms of adverse events. RESULTS: The overall random-effects pooled prevalence of CR was 4.9 (95% CI: 3.2-7.1), PR was 35.6 (95% CI: 31.5-39.9), ORR was 6.8 (95% CI: 5.9-7.8), SD was 8.0 (95% CI: 6.7-9.4), PD was 5.1 (95% CI: 4.1-6.3), and CBR was 13.4 (95% CI: 11.8-15.1). Adverse events associated with the drug were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, nausea, and others. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This is the first meta-analysis conducted in relapsed/refractory mTNBC patients and found that SG is efficacious but associated with some adverse effects that are related to exposure to the drug. The application of these results will allow clinicians to use SG in the management of patients with mTNBC.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive gastric cancer: a multicenter, open-label, expanded-access study.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate that consists of an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody bound by a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker to a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor. Prior to marketing approval in Japan in September 2020, this expanded-access study was conducted to provide T-DXd to previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, expanded-access study was conducted between March 25 and September 25, 2020 at 17 Japanese sites. Previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas received T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg via intravenous infusions at 3-week intervals. Serious adverse events (SAEs), all potential cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis, all liver-related events potentially meeting Hy's Law criteria, and all cases of overdose were reported on the case report forms. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were treated with T-DXd. Among the 17 (26.6%) patients with reported SAEs, 10 (15.6%) had SAEs related to T-DXd treatment. Febrile neutropenia was the most common SAE (n = 6). SAEs led to death in six patients; drug-related SAEs (sepsis and febrile neutropenia) led to death in one patient. Drug-related ILD, as determined by the external Adjudication Committee, occurred in three patients (Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3: all n = 1). CONCLUSION: This expanded-access study provided T-DXd to a broader population of Japanese patients prior to marketing approval in Japan, bridging the gap between clinical trials and drug approval. No new safety concerns were identified.

Real-World Outcomes of First-Line FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab with Irinotecan Dose Escalation versus FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab in BRAFV600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Preliminary Data from a Single-Center Observational Study.

Background and Objectives: Approximately 5-10% of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harbor a BRAFV600E mutation. These patients exhibit distinct metastatic patterns, poor prognosis, and heterogenous survival outcomes. The findings from the TRIBE study indicated that the administration of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment extended the median duration of overall survival (OS). In this study, we explored the effects of UGT1A1 polymorphism on the outcomes of irinotecan dose escalation versus FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 25 patients who had received a diagnosis of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC between October 2015 and August 2022. All patients underwent UGT1A1 genotyping before receiving bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were OS and adverse events (AEs). The two treatment arms were compared in terms of 6-month PFS and 12-month OS. Results: Over a median follow-up duration of 15.0 (interquartile range, 10.0-30.5) months, no significant differences were noted between the treatment arms in severe AEs (SAEs), 6-month PFS, or 12-month OS (all p < 0.05). Regarding AEs, the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen was associated with a lower incidence of anorexia than was the FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab regimen (p = 0.042). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab with irinotecan dose escalation is an effective first-line treatment regimen for patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. This regimen leads to acceptable clinical outcomes with manageable AEs. However, the effects on survival and safety outcomes could only be speculated, and further studies are needed because of the sample size, the follow-up for the OS evaluation, and the non-uniformity in all the variables considered in the two groups.

[The efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in third-line setting for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a real-world study].

Objective: To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the real world. Methods: The clinicopathological data, treatment information, recent treatment efficacy, adverse events and survival data of mCRC patients who had disease progression after treatment with oxaliplatin-based and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and received third-line chemotherapy re-challenge from January 2013 to December 2020 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. Results: A total of 95 mCRC patients were included. Among them, 32 patients (33.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 63 patients (66.3%) received chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs. Eighty-three patients were treated with dual-drug chemotherapy (87.4%), including oxaliplatin re-challenge in 35 patients and irinotecan re-challenge in 48 patients. The remaining 12 patients were treated with triplet chemotherapy regimens (12.6%). Among them, as 5 patients had sequential application of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in front-line treatments, their third-line therapy re-challenged both oxaliplatin and irinotecan; 7 patients only had oxaliplatin prescription before, and these patients re-challenged oxaliplatin in the third-line treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 8.6% (8/93) and 61.3% (57/93), respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 months and 13.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (34.7%) and neutropenia (34.7%), followed by gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as nausea (32.6%) and vomiting (31.6%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mostly hematological toxicity. Cox multivariate analysis showed that gender (HR=1.609, 95% CI: 1.016-2.548) and the PFS of front-line treatments (HR=0.598, 95% CI: 0.378-0.947) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: The results suggested that it is safe and effective for mCRC patients to choose third-line chemotherapy re-challenge, especially for patients with a PFS of more than one year in front-line treatments.

FOLFIRI Chemotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Urachal Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Urachal carcinoma is a rare cancer, with limited evidence regarding systemic chemotherapy for metastatic urachal carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic urachal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic urachal carcinoma treated with FOLFIRI between March 2008 and April 2023 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed using medical records. RESULTS: Six patients with urachal carcinoma received FOLFIRI. The histological type was adenocarcinoma in all patients. The metastatic or recurrent sites were the peritoneum, lungs, lymph nodes, and local relapse sites. Three patients received FOLFIRI as first-line chemotherapy, and the other three received FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy. Two patients had only non-measurable lesions as the targets of tumor response. The best response was the stable disease or non-complete response/non-progressive disease in four patients, with a disease control rate of 67%. The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months. In two patients with ascites only as the site of metastasis, the amount of ascites and serum tumor marker levels decreased after FOLFIRI was initiated. Grade 3/4 toxicities included grade 3 neutropenia in one patient and grade 3 diarrhea in one patient. CONCLUSION: FOLFIRI has modest efficacy and good tolerability for the treatment of metastatic urachal carcinoma.

Phase II study of IRInotecan treatment after COmbined chemo-immunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Protocol of IRICO study.

INTRODUCTION: Combined treatment using anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody (anti-PD-L1) and platinum-etoposide is the current standard first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the best treatment for relapsed ES-SCLC after the first-line treatment remains unclear. There are some approved chemotherapeutic agents that can be used against ES-SCLC, and treatment with irinotecan is well established as both a monotherapy and a combined therapy, in combination with platinum. Therefore, we conduct a phase II study with irinotecan in the second- or later-line setting for patients with ES-SCLC who have been previously treated with combined treatment. METHODS: Our study will enroll total 30 patients who are diagnosed with ES-SCLC and have experienced disease progression after the combined treatment. Patients will receive irinotecan on days 1, 8, and 15, which will be repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of irinotecan (100/80/60 mg/m2 ) will be determined according to the type of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism, and the treatment will be discontinued following disease progression, intolerance, withdrawal of patient consent, and based on the investigator's decision. The primary endpoint of the study is the response rate, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety. DISCUSSION: Since the present first-line treatment has been changed to the combined treatment, the second- or later-line treatment should be re-evaluated for patients with relapsed SCLC. Irinotecan is a major chemotherapeutic agent used for SCLC. This study demonstrates and re-evaluates the clinical benefits of irinotecan after combined treatment with anti-PD-L1 and platinum-etoposide for patients with ES-SCLC. REGISTRATION DETAILS: This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (no. jRCT s071210090) on November 4, 2021.

Irinotecan-Induced Toxicity: A Pharmacogenetic Study Beyond UGT1A1.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Side effects of irinotecan treatment can be dose limiting and may impair quality of life. In this study, we investigated the correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding enzymes involved in the irinotecan metabolism and transport, outside UGT1A1, and irinotecan-related toxicity. We focused on carboxylesterases, which are involved in formation of the active metabolite SN-38 and on drug transporters. METHODS: Patients who provided written informed consent at the Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute to the Code Geno study (local protocol: MEC02-1002) or the IRI28-study (NTR-6612) were enrolled in the study and were genotyped for 15 SNPs in the genes CES1, CES2, SLCO1B1, ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2. RESULTS: From 299 evaluable patients, 86 patients (28.8%) developed severe irinotecan-related toxicity. A significantly higher risk of toxicity was seen in ABCG2 c.421C>A variant allele carriers (P = 0.030, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.06-3.34). Higher age was associated with all grade diarrhea (P = 0.041, OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06). In addition, CES1 c.1165-41C>T and CES1 n.95346T>C variant allele carriers had a lower risk of all-grade thrombocytopenia (P = 0.024, OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.90 and P = 0.018, OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that ABCG2 and CES1 SNPs might be used as predictive markers for irinotecan-induced toxicity.

Quality of life, effectiveness, and safety of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: An analysis of the prospective QoLiTrap study.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) mainly affects older patients. The pivotal VELOUR phase III trial of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI in metastatic CRC (mCRC) included only 5.9% of patients aged ≥75 years. Herein, we report a preplanned analysis from QoLiTrap, a large prospective observational study evaluating the impact of age on quality of life (QoL), effectiveness, and safety of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI in daily clinical practice in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrolled patients had progressive mCRC, had failed a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen, and had received aflibercept (4 mg/kg) plus FOLFIRI every two weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or physician/patient decision. Analyses were performed by age classes (<60, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, and ≥ 75 years). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients whose global health status (GHS) of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was maintained (i.e., no worsening from baseline by at least 5% over a 12-week treatment). Secondary endpoints included tumor objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 1277 patients (<60 years, n = 327; 60-64 years, n = 231; 65-69 years, n = 227; 70-74 years, n = 259; and ≥ 75 years, n = 233) were treated, of whom 872 were evaluable for QoL. GHS was maintained in 36.5%, 41.6%, 38.9%, 41.8%, and 44.8% of patients aged <60, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, and ≥ 75 years, respectively. Age did not influence PFS (median 7.8 months), OS (median 14.4 months), or ORR (20.8%). Number of cycles, dose delays for any cause, and dose reductions for adverse events (AEs) were comparable between age classes. Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 47.7%, 51.9%, 51.5%, 55.2%, and 55.8% of patients aged <60, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, and ≥ 75 years, respectively. The main grade ≥ 3 AEs were hypertension (11.2%) and diarrhea (9%) in patients aged ≥75 years. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that aflibercept plus FOLFIRI maintains QoL and retains its activity, including a high objective tumor response, regardless of age and treatment line. In fit older patients, the safety profile seems manageable, with no new safety signals.

Rapid Reduction of CEA and Stable Metastasis in an NRAS-mutant Rectal-Cancer Patient Treated With FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab Combined With Oral Recombinant Methioninase and a Low-Methionine Diet Upon Metastatic Recurrence After FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab Treatment Alone.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The choice of chemotherapy agents for RAS-mutant colorectal cancer is limited, and prognosis is poor compared to RAS-wild-type colorectal cancer. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of methionine restriction combined with chemotherapy in a patient with NRAS-mutant rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 59-year-old female was diagnosed with lung-metastatic recurrence of NRAS-mutant rectal cancer two and a half years after resection of the primary tumor. She started chemotherapy, which consisted of fluorouracil, irinotecan (FOLFIRI), and bevacizumab, in October 2020. Eight months later, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was performed to treat the lung metastases. She stopped chemotherapy at this point and had blood tests and computed tomography (CT) scans regularly. Her CEA level increased to 139.91 ng/ml and her lung metastasis became larger by September 2022. Therefore, she was reintroduced to FOLFIRI and bevacizumab in October 2022, and also started a low-methionine diet and oral recombinant methioninase (o-rMETase) as a supplement. RESULTS: After starting the combination therapy with o-rMETase, a low-methionine diet, FOLFIRI, and bevacizumab, blood CEA levels very rapidly decreased and were almost within the normal limits five months later. CT findings showed the lung metastasis did not grow. CONCLUSION: Methionine restriction comprising o-rMETase and a low-methionine diet combined with first-line chemotherapy was effective in a patient with NRAS-mutant rectal cancer in which metastasis had re-occurred after first-line chemotherapy alone.

An integrated analysis of Sacituzumab govitecan in relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate that targets the human trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 to deliver SN-38 to cancer cells. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of SG in patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (RM-TNBC). METHODS: For this integrated analysis, from inception to January 2, 2023, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library databases for prospective studies that evaluated SC in RM-TNBC patients. Primary endpoints were survival outcomes and responses. Secondary endpoints were all grade and grade ≥ 3 toxicities. RESULTS: Six hundred potentially relevant records were screened. Our analysis included 3 trials (412 patients). Median overall survival was 12.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-14.4), progression-free survival was 5.7 months (5% CI, 5.1-6.3), and duration of objective response was 7.4 months (5% CI, 5.8-9.0). The objective response rate was 34%, and the disease control rate was 71%. Key grade ≥ 3 toxicities (in over 10% of the patients) included neutropenia (46%), leukopenia (12%), febrile neutropenia (11%), diarrhea (11%), and anemia (10%). Four treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: SG was associated with effectiveness in patients with RM-TNBC. Myelosuppression and diarrhea were the primary treatment-related adverse events.

Mutual ATRaction: Assessing Synergy of Berzosertib with Sacituzumab Govitecan.

A phase I trial of the novel combination of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitor berzosertib plus the antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan in patients with heavily pretreatment tumors demonstrated some antitumor activity and no dose-limiting toxicities. This represents a new treatment paradigm that will be further explored in a phase II setting. See related article by Abel et al., p. 3603.

UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: time to prioritize patient safety.

Tweetable abstract Pretreatment UGT1A1 genotyping and a 70% irinotecan dose intensity in poor metabolizers is safe, feasible, cost-effective and essential for safe irinotecan treatment in cancer patients. It is time to update guidelines to swiftly enable the implementation of UGT1A1 genotype-guided irinotecan dosing in routine oncology care.